MENU

Click here to

×

Are you sure ?

Yes, do it No, cancel

DISCLAIMER:
Entry of taxonomy/keywords during proffered abstract submission was optional.
Not all abstracts will appear in search results.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z # | show all

Keywords: noise
MO-K-DBRB-2Improved PET Quantification by Adaptive Denoising and Regularized Image Reconstruction: A Feasibility Study
M Namias1*, R Jeraj2 , (1) Fundacion Centro Diagnostico Nuclear, Buenos Aires, Argentina, (2) University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
SU-E-205-2Defining CT Noise and Dose Reference Levels From Clinical Patient Populations
F Ria*, J Solomon , J Wilson , Y Zhang , T Smith , E Samei , Duke University Health System, Durham, NC
SU-E-205-3Evaluation of Size-Specific Noise Index On Revolution CT: A Phantom Study
F Rupcich1*, H Litt2 , D Crotty1 , (1) GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, (2) Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
SU-E-205-4Impact of Noise On CT Readers
B Whiting1*, S Don2 , D Politte3 , A Mitra4 , C Abbey5 , (1) University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, (2) Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, (3) Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, (4) Washington University, Saint Louis, MO, (5) UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
SU-E-205-7Use of Mercury Phantom to Predict CT Image Noise and Inform Protocol Design
F Ria*, J B Solomon , Y Zhang , J M Wilson , E Samei , Duke University Health System, Durham (NC)
SU-I-GPD-T-158A Correction of the Gamma Test for Monte Carlo Dose Distributions Comparison
M Cohilis*, E Sterpin , J Lee , K Souris , Universite Catholique de Louvain, Woluwe, Brussels
TH-AB-KDBRB1-4Deep Learning Based PET Image Noise Reduction Using Both PET and CT Information
X Jin1*, J Fan1 , X Rui2 , (1) GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, (2) GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York
TU-C1030-GePD-F8-5Relation Between Deviation Index and Contrast to Noise Ratio in Portable Digital Chest Radiography
J Dave*, E Gingold , B Sundaram , Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
TU-C930-GePD-F1-4Low Dose CT Strategies: In Which Domain Should I Denoise My Data?
J Hayes , D Gomez-Cardona , J Cruz-Bastida , R Zhang*, K Li , G Chen , University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI
TU-C930-GePD-F6-1A Robust Tracking Algorithm for Implanted Marker of Fluoroscopic Images in a Real-Time Tumor-Tracking System
K Miyazaki1*, Y Fujii1 , T Umekawa1 , T Yamada1 , T FUJII2 , N Miyamoto2 , (1) Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi-shi, Ibaraki,(2) Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido
TU-C930-GePD-F9-1A Monte Carlo Study of the Impact of Electronic Noise On Low-Dose EPID Image Simulation
M Shi1 2*, M Myronakis2, Y Hu2, J Rottmann2, R Berbeco2, (1) University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, (2) Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
WE-C1030-GePD-F8-3Content-Oriented Sparse Representation (COSR) Denoising in Perfusion CT for Dose Reduction
Huiqiao Xie, Xiangyang Tang*, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA