DISCLAIMER:
Entry of taxonomy/keywords during proffered abstract submission was optional.
Not all abstracts will appear in search results.
Taxonomy: TH- External beam- photons: Quality Assurance - Linear accelerator
| MO-AB-SAN1-5 | A Streamlined Commissioning Procedure for Efficient Halcyon Implementation T Pawlicki1*, G Kim1 , T Aland2 , T Jarema2 , D Brown1 , (1) UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, (2) Icon Group, South Brisbane, Australia |
| MO-E115-GePD-F4-1 | A Software Tool to Harvest and Analyze MLC Log Files of the Elekta VersaHD Linear Accelerator P Myers*, C Kabat , D Saenz , K Rasmussen , N Kirby , N Papanikolaou , S Stathakis , University of Texas HSC SA, San Antonio, TX |
| MO-I345-GePD-F2-3 | Machine Learning Modeling of Beam Data of Multiple Linear Accelerators (LINACs) From Different Institutions and Its Practical Application in Fast and Robust LINAC Commissioning E Schueler*, W Zhao , I Patil , B Han , Y Yang , L Xing , Stanford Univ School of Medicine, Stanford, CA |
| MO-I345-GePD-F3-2 | Characterization and Longitudinal Assessment of Daily Quality Assurance On An MR-Guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) Linac D Dunkerley*, P Yadav , J Bayouth , K Mittauer , School of Medicine and Public Health UW-Madison, Madison, WI |
| PO-GePV-P-73 | Towards Efficient Automated LINAC Quality Assurance: A Feasibility Study S Lim , R Kuo , L Happersett , L Hong , X Li , D Lovelock*, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY |
| PO-GePV-P-102 | Automated Winston-Lutz Test Using XML Script and Developer Mode in TrueBeam STx A Alarcon*, C Venencia , Instituto Zunino, Cordoba - ARGENTINA |
| PO-GePV-T-35 | New Acceptance Criteria for Evaluating Electron Beam Percentage Depth Dose Using OSLD Remote Audits P Alvarez*, P Taylor , J Lowenstein , A Molineu , S Kry , D Followill , UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX |
| PO-GePV-T-256 | Which One Is More Reliable in Determining Leaf Position Uncertainties: SNC Machineâ„¢ Hancock MLC Test Or AutoCALâ„¢ MLC Test K Jacobs*, C Yang , Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Med. Center, Jackson, MS |
| PO-GePV-T-259 | An Accurate Profile-Based Method for Starshot Analysis R Rahimi Darabad, K Padgett, N Dogan, Y Yang*, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL |
| PO-GePV-T-261 | Is Machine Performance Check a Reliable QA Tool in TrueBeam Linacs? A Rangel*, F Khan , P Chi , Trillium Health Partners/The Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON |
| PO-GePV-T-264 | Simultaneous Optimization of Radiation-Imaging Coincidence for All Versa HD Photon Energies C Knill*, R Halford , M Snyder , R Sandhu , D Lack , Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI |
| PO-GePV-T-267 | A Simple Pre-Treatment Quality Assurance Procedure for SBRT C Kim*, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY |
| PO-GePV-T-275 | New LINAC Acceptance & Commissioning Experience: Should We Be Accepting An Accelerator Overlooking a Risk of ±31% Dose Inhomogeneity at the Junctions? N Paudel1*, (1) UPMC Susquehanna, Hillman Cancer Center, Williamsport, PA |
| PO-GePV-T-309 | The Efficacy of a Non-Metallic Target for An End-To-End Winston-Lutz Phantom for Use with C-Arm Linear Accelerator Treatment Devices P Mone*, D Workie , Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD |
| PO-GePV-T-313 | Reproducible Beam-Position Hysteresis Observed with Direction of Linac Gantry Rotation D Pinkham1*, S Kamath1 , S Hancock3 , (1) Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, (2) Southeast Missouri Hospital, Cape Girardeau, MO |
| PO-GePV-T-322 | Resolution and Accuracy of BB Detection in Commercial and In-House Winston-Lutz Analysis Algorithms M Malin1*, J Partouche2 , T Qu1 , (1) NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, (2) University of Chicago, Chicago, IL |
| SU-K-301-1 | A Systematic Evaluation of the Error Detection Abilities of a Novel Diode Transmission Detector V Sarkar*, A Paxton , J Kunz , M Szegedi , G Nelson , F Su , Y Huang , H Zhao , P Rassiah-Szegedi , B Salter , University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT |
| SU-K-SAN1-5 | Quality Assurance of Beam Energy and Output for Gated Treatment Delivery Using IC Profiler and Quad Wedges L Hu1*, D Barbee1 , (1) NYU Langone Health, New York, NY |
| SU-L-301-6 | Optical Imaging Based Automated QA of Radiotherapy Couch Motions E Pearson*, X Liu , R Wiersma , The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL |
| TH-BC-301-3 | Corrections to EPID-Based MLC QA Images Improve Sensitivity and Specificity N Koch1*, C Vanderstraeten2 , K Pearman1 , T Hayes1 , (1) Cone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, NC, (2) Cone Health/Alamance Regional Cancer Center, Burlington, NC |
| TU-C930-GePD-F4-3 | Time Evolution of the Response of Irradiated EBT-XD Radiochromic Films D Mulrow*1,2, Y Leon1, A Darafsheh1, R Khan1, (1) Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, (2) Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO |
| TU-C930-GePD-F4-5 | Development of a Mailed Dosimetric Audit System for External Beam Radiation Therapy Using Alanine Dosimeters M McEwen1*, I Mansour2 , (1) National Research Council, Ottawa, ON, (2) Carleton University, Ottawa, |
| WE-C1000-GePD-F3-1 | A Streamlined Monthly QA Process Using a Novel Phantom W Weaver1*, S Bosma2 , (1) Alyzen Medical Physics, Jonesboro, AR, (2) University of Kentucky , Lexington, KY |
| WE-F-SAN4-0 | EPID Machine QA Implementation and Automation, Are We There Yet? C Shi1*, M Barnes2*, B Sun3*, (1) Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Marlboro, NJ, (2) Calvary Mater Hospital Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia, (3) Washington Univ. in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO |
| WE-F-SAN4-1 | Role of EPID in new linac commission and the SSIM concept for evaluation C Shi1*, M Barnes2*, B Sun3*, (1) Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Marlboro, NJ, (2) Calvary Mater Hospital Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia, (3) Washington Univ. in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO |
| WE-F-SAN4-2 | Improving MPC and aligning better with TG-142 C Shi1*, M Barnes2*, B Sun3*, (1) Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Marlboro, NJ, (2) Calvary Mater Hospital Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia, (3) Washington Univ. in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO |
| WE-F-SAN4-3 | Practical implementation of EPID-based QA for linac C Shi1*, M Barnes2*, B Sun3*, (1) Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Marlboro, NJ, (2) Calvary Mater Hospital Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia, (3) Washington Univ. in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO |
| WE-HI-304-0 | Vendor Provided Data, Tools and Test Procedures K Smith1*, T Pawlicki2*, M Lee3*, J Kapatoes4*, (1) Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, (2) UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, (4) Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL |
| WE-HI-304-1 | Vendor Provided Data, Tools and Test Procedures: Benefits and Concerns K Smith1*, T Pawlicki2*, M Lee3*, J Kapatoes4*, (1) Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, (2) UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, (4) Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL |
| WE-HI-304-2 | Vendor Provided Data, Tools and Test Procedures: What Is Safe Practice? K Smith1*, T Pawlicki2*, M Lee3*, J Kapatoes4*, (1) Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, (2) UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, (4) Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL |
| WE-HI-304-3 | The Linac Vendor Perspective K Smith1*, T Pawlicki2*, M Lee3*, J Kapatoes4*, (1) Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, (2) UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, (4) Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL |
| WE-HI-304-4 | The 3rd Party QA Tool Provider Perspectove K Smith1*, T Pawlicki2*, M Lee3*, J Kapatoes4*, (1) Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, (2) UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, (4) Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL |
