DISCLAIMER:
Entry of taxonomy/keywords during proffered abstract submission was optional.
Not all abstracts will appear in search results.
| MO-GH-301-3 | Therapy Physics Education in a Virtual Learning Environment M Hyun1*, A Smith1 , J Koth1 , A Ekpenyong2 , L Bartenhagen1 , (1) University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, (2) Creighton University, Omaha, NE |
| MO-I345-GePD-F2-3 | Machine Learning Modeling of Beam Data of Multiple Linear Accelerators (LINACs) From Different Institutions and Its Practical Application in Fast and Robust LINAC Commissioning E Schueler*, W Zhao , I Patil , B Han , Y Yang , L Xing , Stanford Univ School of Medicine, Stanford, CA |
| MO-K-304-0 | Clinical Application of Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) M Podgorsak1*, R Popple2*, K Sixel3*, J Yang4*, M Podgorsak5*, (1) Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, (2) University Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, (3) R.S. McLaughlin Durham Reg Cancer Ctr, Oshawa, ON, (4) Alliance Imaging/Alliance Oncology, Havertown, PA, (5) Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY |
| PO-GePV-P-12 | National Remote Quality Audit of LINAC-Based Radiotherapy in Korea H Chung1*, H Kim1 , M Song1 , K Kim2 , S Han2 , S Choi2 , K Kim2 , G Cho2 , (1) Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Daejeon, Korea ,(2) Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea |
| PO-GePV-P-73 | Towards Efficient Automated LINAC Quality Assurance: A Feasibility Study S Lim , R Kuo , L Happersett , L Hong , X Li , D Lovelock*, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY |
| PO-GePV-T-43 | Geometrical Characterization of Medical Linear Accelerators with An Integrated Magnetic Resonance Imaging System H Riis1*, C Brink1,2 , A Bertelsen1 , U Bernchou1,2 , F Mahmood1,2 , Y Cho3 , D Moseley3 , (1) Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark, (2) Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark, (3) Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada |
| PO-GePV-T-256 | Which One Is More Reliable in Determining Leaf Position Uncertainties: SNC Machineâ„¢ Hancock MLC Test Or AutoCALâ„¢ MLC Test K Jacobs*, C Yang , Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Med. Center, Jackson, MS |
| PO-GePV-T-261 | Is Machine Performance Check a Reliable QA Tool in TrueBeam Linacs? A Rangel*, F Khan , P Chi , Trillium Health Partners/The Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON |
| PO-GePV-T-264 | Simultaneous Optimization of Radiation-Imaging Coincidence for All Versa HD Photon Energies C Knill*, R Halford , M Snyder , R Sandhu , D Lack , Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI |
| PO-GePV-T-269 | CyberKnife Output Constancy Utilizing Daily QA3 Device T Reynolds1*, M Ozer1 , A Jensen1 , (1) MN Oncology, St Paul, MN |
| PO-GePV-T-274 | A Quantitative Study of CDR-CAS-IMAT Simulated Delivery Errors for Brain Tumors R Zhang1,2*, W Bai2 , Y Feng1 , W Jiang1 , (1)Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China,(2)The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, |
| PO-GePV-T-275 | New LINAC Acceptance & Commissioning Experience: Should We Be Accepting An Accelerator Overlooking a Risk of ±31% Dose Inhomogeneity at the Junctions? N Paudel1*, (1) UPMC Susquehanna, Hillman Cancer Center, Williamsport, PA |
| PO-GePV-T-301 | A Compound Refractive Lens for Radiation Oncology Megavoltage X-Rays R Rademacher1*, (1) Genesis Healthcare Partners, San Diego, CA |
| PO-GePV-T-302 | Midline Surface Isocenter: Improved Initial Patient Setup for Breast Cancer Patients T Reynolds1*, M Ozer1 , (1) MN Oncology, St Paul, MN |
| PO-GePV-T-341 | Plan Quality Comparison of Gamma Knife and Linac-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases J Carter1*, Y Ding2 , I Vergalasova1 , X Wang1 , Y Zhang1 , J Weiner1 , N Yue1 , K Nie1 , (1) Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, (2) Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China |
| PO-GePV-T-368 | Validating the Brainlab Cranial SRS Element for the Versa HD C Knill*, R Sandhu , R Halford , Z Seymour , Beaumont Hospital, Dearborn, MI |
| PO-GePV-T-374 | Positioning Accuracy for SBRT Lung Patients Determined by Post-Treatment Cone-Beam CT Imaging T Reynolds1 , M Ozer1*, (1) MN Oncology, St Paul, MN |
| PO-GePV-T-379 | Determination of IMRT Factor for VMAT Treatment Technique Amanjot Kaur1,2*, P. N. Pawaskar2 , G. Sahani3 , (1) Mahatma Phule Charitable Trust Hospital, Navi Mumbai, India, (2) D. Y. Patil Education Society (Deemed to be University), Kolhapur, India, (3) Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, Mumbai, India |
| PO-GePV-T-389 | Gel Dosimetry to Commission a Research Linear Accelerator for Small Field Animal Irradiation Studies N Ba Sunbul*, I Oraiqat , B Rosen , C Miller , M Matuszak , S Clarke , S Pozzi , J Moran , I El Naqa , Univ of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI |
| SU-I400-GePD-F6-1 | An Experimental Evaluation of Mega-Voltage Fan-Beam CT Using a Linear Accelerator H Gong1*, S Tao1 , J Gagneur2 , W Liu2 , C McCollough1 , Y Hu2 , S Leng1 , (1) Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, (2) Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ |
| SU-L-302-2 | A New Design for Rapid Acquisition of Cone Beam CT Images On C-Arm Style Medical Linear Accelerators E Parsai*, E Salari , N Sperling , University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH |
| SU-L-SAN4-3 | Benchmarking of Low-Field MR-Linacs in a Multi-Institutional International Consortium C Glide-Hurst1*, P Yadav2 , A Gutierrez3 , G Gungor4 , D Hoffmans5 , K Mittauer2 , A Sethi6 , T Romaguera3 , R Pennell7 , M Palacios5 , E Omari6 , S Meeks8 , H Mailleux9 , O Green10 , P Fau9 , A Doemer1 , J.K. DeWyngaert7 , K Boye11 , A Shah8 , S Klueter12 , R Lotey13 , M Bellon13 , (1) Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, (2) School of Medicine and Public Health UW-Madison, Madison, WI, (3) Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, (4) INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCE OF ACIBADEM UNIVERSITY, Istanbul, (5) Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, (6) Loyola Univ Medical Center, Maywood, IL, (7)New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, (8) UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, (9) Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France,(10) Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, (11) Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Denmark,(12) Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany, (13) ViewRay Incorporated, Mountain View, CA |
| SU-L-SAN4-8 | An Open-Source Approach to Automating Data-Analysis for Multiple Linac Commissioning K Hasse*, A Perez-Andujar , Y Natsuaki , A Witztum , B Ziemer , S St. James , University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA |
| TU-C930-GePD-F4-5 | Development of a Mailed Dosimetric Audit System for External Beam Radiation Therapy Using Alanine Dosimeters M McEwen1*, I Mansour2 , (1) National Research Council, Ottawa, ON, (2) Carleton University, Ottawa, |
| TU-J345-GePD-F3-2 | Comparison of Beam Data Collected with and Without Crossline Offset Correction for a 1.5 T MR-Linac B Yang*, W Lam , M Law , Y Ho , C Ho , K Cheung , S Yu , Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Island |
| WE-AB-303-6 | Evaluation of a Novel MR-Compatible 3D Scanner J Kim1*, T Mertens2 , D Du1 , A Doemer1 , J Dolan1 , I Xhaferllari3 , I Chetty1 , N Wen1 , (1) Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, (2) LAP GmbH, Germany,(3) William Beaumont Hospital, Troy, MI |
| WE-C1000-GePD-F3-1 | A Streamlined Monthly QA Process Using a Novel Phantom W Weaver1*, S Bosma2 , (1) Alyzen Medical Physics, Jonesboro, AR, (2) University of Kentucky , Lexington, KY |
| WE-I-SAN4-0 | Point/Counterpoint Live Debate: Modern Linacs Monitor Units Should Be Defined in Water at 10 Cm Depth Rather Than at DMAX F Van den Heuvel1*, Q Wu2*, K Kielar3*, C Sandin4*, F Van den Heuvel5*, (1) University of Oxford, Oxford, ,(2) Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, (4) Elekta Ltd, Crawley, WSX, (5) University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom |
| WE-I-SAN4-1 | I think that Linacs should be calibrated at d_max. No wait! I changed my mind! No it should! I am confused. F Van den Heuvel1*, Q Wu2*, K Kielar3*, C Sandin4*, F Van den Heuvel5*, (1) University of Oxford, Oxford, ,(2) Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, (4) Elekta Ltd, Crawley, WSX, (5) University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom |
| WE-I-SAN4-2 | Panel Member F Van den Heuvel1*, Q Wu2*, K Kielar3*, C Sandin4*, F Van den Heuvel5*, (1) University of Oxford, Oxford, ,(2) Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, (4) Elekta Ltd, Crawley, WSX, (5) University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom |
| WE-I-SAN4-3 | Panel Member C Wessels*, Varian Medical Systems, Ennetbaden, AG |
| WE-I-SAN4-4 | Panel Member F Van den Heuvel1*, Q Wu2*, K Kielar3*, C Sandin4*, F Van den Heuvel5*, (1) University of Oxford, Oxford, ,(2) Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, (4) Elekta Ltd, Crawley, WSX, (5) University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom |
| WE-I-SAN4-5 | Panel Member F Van den Heuvel1*, Q Wu2*, K Kielar3*, C Sandin4*, F Van den Heuvel5*, (1) University of Oxford, Oxford, ,(2) Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, (4) Elekta Ltd, Crawley, WSX, (5) University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom |
| WE-I-SAN4-6 | Panel Discussion F Van den Heuvel1*, Q Wu2*, K Kielar3*, C Sandin4*, F Van den Heuvel5*, (1) University of Oxford, Oxford, ,(2) Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, (4) Elekta Ltd, Crawley, WSX, (5) University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom |
