MENU

Click here to

×

Are you sure ?

Yes, do it No, cancel

Influence of Dosimeter Leakage Current On the Determination of Absorbed Dose to Water

N Kinoshita1*, A Takemura2, H Oguchi3, E Kidoya1, H Shioura4, H Kimura4, (1) Radiological Center, University of Fukui Hospital, JP, (2) Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, JP, (3) Department of Radiological and Medical Laboratory Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, JP, (4) Department of Radiology, University of Fukui Hospital, JP

Presentations

(Sunday, 7/12/2020)   [Eastern Time (GMT-4)]

Room: AAPM ePoster Library

Purpose: The AAPM has published an addendum in the AAPM Task Group 51 report, which showed a new correction factor to account for the contributions from leakage current. This study aimed to determine the influence of leakage current from chamber–cable–electrometer systems (dosimeters) on the determination of the absorbed dose to water for high-energy photon and electron beams. Thus, this work assessed the leakage currents from dosimeters.
Methods: Sixteen dosimeters were used. The ionization chambers of the dosimeters were (the number of detectors of each type is given in parentheses): PTW30013 (9); IBA PPC40 (5); and IBA NACP-02 (2). The electrometers of the dosimeters were (the number of electrometers investigated is given in parentheses): TOYO MEDIC RAMTEC Duo (2); TOYO MEDIC RAMTEC Smart (6); and TOYO MEDIC RAMTEC 1000plus (1). We determined the leakage currents according to the addendum to TG-51; thus, they were measured with all the equipment used for the absorbed dose measurement in place and the accelerator and dosimeters on, but there was no beam. The measurement times for the leakage currents correspond to the irradiation times during the calibration of the clinical treatment machine output.
Results: The leakage currents for the dosimeters containing cylindrical chambers were 12 fA or less, except for the PTW 30013-RAMTEC 1000plus system, where they were as high as 32 fA. By contrast, those for dosimeters that contained plane-parallel chambers were 13 fA or less.
Conclusion: The leakage currents investigated contributed much less than 0.1% to the charge readings in determining the absorbed dose for external photon and electron beams. These findings suggest that the leakage effect can be considered negligible in the clinical measurement of the dose.?

Download ePoster [PDF]

Keywords

Dosimetry Protocols, Ionization Chamber

Taxonomy

TH- Radiation Dose Measurement Devices: ion chamber: air cavity

Contact Email