Room: Room 202
Purpose: Tremendous efforts have been made to improve image quality and reduce exposure in CT. However, one important parameter, scan length, is less frequently optimized or even monitored. To understand how much unnecessary CT scan coverage (â€œover-scanâ€?) was performed in routine clinical CT exams, we inspected all the â€œCT LUNG CANCER SCREENINGâ€? exams that were performed in our facility between September 2016 and September 2017. Machine learning algorithms were used to detect the lung region from the scout PA images, and â€œrequiredâ€? scan range calculated automatically. This scan range was then compared with the actual scan range.
Methods: A neural network model based on the â€œUNETâ€? framework was established, and the model trained with the public dataset â€œJSRTâ€?, which contains 247 chest x-ray images and corresponding lung masks. This model was then further trained with 12 CT scout images and corresponding lung masks from our local dataset. The trained model was applied to the scout images of the remaining CT lung cancer screening exams to detect and segment the lung region. The upper and lower boundaries of the segmentation maps were recorded as the â€œrequiredâ€? scan range, and then compared with the actual scan range.
Results: For the 145 exams that were included in this study, the average â€œrequiredâ€? scan length was 253 mm with standard deviation of 27 mm. The average â€œover-scanâ€? was 62 mm or 25%. The upper boundary (Superior) on average has an â€œover-scanâ€? of 17 mm, and the lower boundary (Inferior) on average has an â€œover-scanâ€? of 45 mm.
Conclusion: Scan coverage of about 25% more than â€œnecessaryâ€? has been observed in CT Lung Cancer Screening exams. Even allowing for some safety margin to ensure coverage, improvement opportunity exists to further reduce patient dose and radiologist workload by reducing scan length.
Quality Assurance, CT, Computer Vision